Paul Wouters wrote: > see many discussions here in the last. The debian and fedora maintainers > both asks for it to be decoupled, as the tar ball copy inside unbound is > confusing and can sometimes accidentally get linked by unbound if the > ldns dev/devel package is not installed. Staticly linked libraries on > systems are not good. If you think you have ldns 1.6.10 but unbound had > been statically linked to 1.6.9, you might have a security issue.....
actually i don't think i've requested ldns to be unbundled from unbound (i think that was ondrej, who is the ldns package maintainer), but i'm happy to see the unbound source tarball a bit smaller and for it to be impossible for bundled ldns to be used. -- Robert Edmonds [email protected] _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
