[ Quoting <[email protected]> in "Re: [Unbound-users] unbound wrapper..." ] > > ub_result->answer_packet the message-id in the message 0. Is this > > on purpose or do I screw up somewhere? > > Yes, on purpose, since this reply is from a unix-pipe, the ID field > does not have to be used.
Ok.
> > Another thing is that there is no TTL in ub_result, also on purpose
> > I presume?
>
> There is in the answer packet, TTL per resource record even. A TTL
> field could be added to the ub_result, but would break ABI, even
> though it is not that interesting for most users (and power users can
> parse the answer_packet).
Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for your reply.
Regards,
--
Miek Gieben http://miek.nl
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
