-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tony,
On 07/02/2012 05:17 PM, Tony Finch wrote: > W.C.A. Wijngaards <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Yes, on purpose, since this reply is from a unix-pipe, the ID >> field does not have to be used. > > I thought that DNS responses do not have to come in the same order > as requests, even over stream connections. Actually, stream responses could be like that, but I would not know how backwards compatible with the deployed software that would be. Unbound serves stream responses in the order they have been queried for that reason. This reply we talk about here is an internal pipe in the implementation of libunbound, and another field is used to disambiguate it (libunbound could support more than 64k concurrent queries, therefore it does not use the 16bit ID value). Best regards, Wouter -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJP8pkhAAoJEJ9vHC1+BF+NMPsP/joiLiWcYdN5H4eYo7ryxstb ek+nP48mqDkbguMBsj/WlS1dcm3ooqX+VDUVIr6BoKEg+BmcdQ3Pgm7sXQ/fJ35m IjPLwtvNz0nOnYUYWsrr9pRqOi/QE2Mz+PDcytuxUNAiZkbTBfYleiKBAZJtJK4B e5rTAE4VGcz7f+0EQAolYbAf5HhjHfVEKcOV5pn4lmNObAxMg9k5R7tzQevgmNN5 indDXtuNH+0G4RRMn2FWRxgf2yIdoMBcmUBZqYPlYIYxGYu3mMlkCYeEw6o+Am+O 22NeO0AD+HkRBl+mT0AsERqSWMpCi/1jjuS6UaHdQSMy1zmj9gowSCRnpi6t90GT o37BMpOIXl6xsKF5MHKaiHy9xnk4jl/MIEgVa+CMWKeP9uLotnw1DyTD0Feq7aNf Hd/Qvff7iG+hAq7vMR3a4il/tAWm3gMpAL+9ju5pK9zppcDJPToeHkTYt50hDLis n4X2h+zPoqC+7hz61vW9RzJzUBEipxtPNfDdcMdDRCpp3y22ue1sBa8XssYY4hb9 dy3HEL9lKBxrRWLyHxLWjZ6dQnZUhwbOqAlTMvqhrCNuT+dzL8RYIAxsAguSyIq9 iGfgCkL3VCpkGtErdTsWMQmgQUvQIwOW84Mlrk562eAcRs1IHjbwwR/nV+Q39Hux /BwMI4lKLy02Ao+u/GB5 =o6eO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Unbound-users mailing list [email protected] http://unbound.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/unbound-users
