Carol,

You have asked such an important question!  However, it seems that the more 
important the question, the less clear the answer.  (And how often, in a 
attempt to answer, we actually raise more questions!)  At the moment, my 
thinking is that ALL readers should be engaging in text that is challenging, 
from babyhood through adulthood.   The key is that I thinking text can be 
deemed challenging on many layers: reading "level" (whatever that means), 
vocabulary, lack of prior knowledge, text structure, genre, "meaning", purpose, 
interest, content, etc.  From what I've read and observed, students must be 
challeged on at least one layer in order for them to become authentically 
absorbed in the text.  When they are challenged on too many layers, that is 
when text becomes frustrating and the meaning-making process often breaks down 
in a big way.  The problem I see is that teachers typically seem to only think 
about "reading level" when answering this question.  I think we owe it to kids 
to make the conversation about so much more than that!  I've found that 
instructional decisions are the most sound when we make them based on RIGOR 
(which can be achieved in multiple ways), RELEVANCE (kids "get" the point and 
engage authentically), and RESPECT (building a respectful relationship between 
student and teacher, but also helping students to build a respectful 
relationship between themselves and learning.)  

Right now I'm thinking that I have just chosen words for concepts that I have 
so much more thinking and questions about.  In an effort to be concise, did I 
choose the right words to get my ideas across?  For example:  the phrase "When 
they are challenged on too many layers..." - what does "too many" mean?  I 
think it probably differs for each reader in each circumstance.  I suppose I 
think that these are conversations and questions that should be shared with 
kids in think-alouds and conferences.  We need to be asking them about what 
kind of "challenges" truly challenge them.  When do they realize that they've 
taken on "too much"?  Do they even realize it when they have?  What does 'just 
the right amount' of challenge feel like?  What feelings do they have when the 
challenge is 'too great'?  What do they do when they have that feeling?  What 
motivates them to tackle text that is challenging for them on multiple levels?  

Oh my!  I could go on and on...I'm hoping we'll have some meaningful responses 
to this question that we can really dig into!

Amy Swan
3rd Grade Teacher
Cedar Creek Elementary
(913)780-7360 
CHECK OUT OUR CLASS WEBPAGE!! http://teachers.olathe.k12.ks.us/~aswancc/ 

>>> Carol Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/17/08 8:41 AM >>>
Hi, all,

I have questions regarding the text students choose to read during  
independent reading.

I had always been told that students should read at their independent  
reading (99%) during independent reading. When I heard Ellin last  
year at a conference, she talked about students needing to read  
challenging material during independent reading. It really started me  
thinking about how we can move students in our district forward. (You  
need to know that on our state test over 85% of our students meet and  
exceed standards in all grades 3-8.)

We are being challenged by our board regarding the rigor of the  
curriculum, and I do agree that we do need to up the rigor, but am  
not sure what that means to a classroom teacher. I know that teachers  
tend to teach the same skills or strategies over grade levels. For  
example, our framework states that in grade 5 students will begin to  
identify double plot novels, yet I know some teachers are not  
introducing that strategy by that grade. With our population, that is  
not an unreasonable expectation.

I realize that students need to read easier books when they are  
learning content in social studies and science in order to learn new  
content. But as we look at how to re structure our independent  
reading, I'd like to know what you all do. Do you encourage students  
to choose independent or more challenging reading/text. We are  
contemplating using the Schoolwide Enrichment Model - REading that is  
from the University of Connecticut, and they recommend students read  
1 year above their grade level, I think. The SEM R model is  
recommended for grades 3-8.

At what level should students begin to read challenging text? I  
understand that primary students need to develop their fluency and  
easy reading is excellent for that. But then, how do they learn to  
comprehend?

In reading the posts both with this list and the MRA notes, I'd like  
to hear your thoughts.

Carol
District 102
Language Arts Content Specialist


On Mar 16, 2008, at 8:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>
> I have struggled with this for years. Maybe, we need to consider  
> what the
> purpose is for our lesson(s). If we are working on fluency,  
> decoding skills we
> need easy books. But couldn't we be modeling the struggle through  
> read alouds
> when teaching comprehension???
> Then...there are books which are very simply written which require
> inferential thinking---a struggle---to comprehend. An example might  
> be "the  Giving
> Tree" or "Grandfather Twilight." Many poems would also seem to work  
> for  this
> purpose...decodable words but deeper meanings when read and reread...
> Perhaps it is all about balance...giving kids LOTS of easy reading to
> develop proficiency AND opportunities to stretch their minds.
> Jennifer
>
> In a message dated 3/16/2008 2:56:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> just  heard Dick Allington at Michigan Reading Association on  
> Saturday,
> March 15.  It was very interesting. He spoke of the  
> misunderstanding that
> kids have to  struggle with text to understand, but adults won't.  The
> example he  gave was this.  If we have a typical adult text with  
> 300 words
> per  page. Thinking it is an independent level of 99 percent, the  
> reader
> would  not know 3 words a page.  Most adults would not read the  
> book.   Adults
> expect to know 99.99999999999999999 percent of the words.  So  why  
> do we as
> teachers think it is ok to give kids books at an instructional   
> level of 97
> percent let alone 99 percent?  We need to be very careful  with our  
> teaching
> decisions.  He had a ton more for us to think  about
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL  
> Money &
> Finance.      (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)
> _______________________________________________
> Understand mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/ 
> understand_literacyworkshop.org


_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

**********************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is from the Olathe District Schools. The 
message and any attachments may be confidential or privileged and are intended 
only for the individual or entity identified above as the addressee. If you are 
not the addressee, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, you 
are not authorized to read, copy or distribute this message or any attachments. 
We ask that you please delete this message and any attachments and notify the 
sender by return email or by phone (913) 780-7000.

_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

Reply via email to