On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:08:26 +0200 Pierre wrote: > > apart from this I've noticed that most of the fonts that don't display > > correctly have glyphs listed only under "Un-mapped Glyphs". These are not > > only signs fonts, but also character fonts. > > Consider that such fonts can’t be normally used. In fact most programs won’t > let you access these un-mapped (means they’re not referenced in Unicode > charmap) glyphs. You can check the charmaps present or computed for a font in > the sub-header of the "Informations" tab. FYI, Scribus will even discard > fonts which have not a Unicode charmap, I don’t know for OOo - will check > later. > Ok seems like those fonts are "Machintosh Latin" encoded! At least this is what fontforge tells me. And FontMatrix read it as "APPLE_ROMAN". Is it right those fonts won't be rendered in FontMatrix? For the symbols fonts, they are listed both as APPLE_ROMAN and MS_SYMBOLS (and fontforge reads its encoding as "Mac Latin").
> > Another strange issue I have is with Arial: this font renders correctly on > > Fontmatrix but in Openoffice is rendered as "Planet X" font. I don't know > > what is causing this. > > Odd, Arial is not known to have issues, but the size of ArialUni. quite enough! -- Matteo 'Peach' Pescarin Jabber ID = [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site = http://www.smartart.it GeCHI = http://www.gechi.it _______________________________________________ Undertype-users mailing list Undertype-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/undertype-users
