Odp: Re: RE: Why was L2/25-061 provisionally assigned?

Thu, 17 Apr 2025 14:22:24 -0700 

I know that there is no evidence for a compatibility codepage for the character 
proposed in L2/25-061, but I'm talking about the precedent for composing 
spacing diacritics with combining characters, not for encoding precomposed 
forms.   Dnia 17 kwietnia 2025 23:09 Doug Ewell <[email protected]> 
napisał(a):  [email protected] wrote:   And there is already precedent of 
spacing diacritics composed with  combining characters, particularly U+0385 
which is composed as U+00A8  U+0301 (although the precomposed version is 
encoded as it's essential  for CP869, CP1253, and ISO 8859-7 
compatibility).   No character that was encoded solely for compatibility with 
existing character sets (and it looks like U+0385 is one of those) ever serves 
as a precedent for encoding other similar characters for which the 
compatibility issue does not apply.   --  Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, 
US | ewellic.org

Reply via email to