[email protected] wrote: > And there is already precedent of spacing diacritics composed with > combining characters, particularly U+0385 which is composed as U+00A8 > U+0301 (although the precomposed version is encoded as it's essential > for CP869, CP1253, and ISO 8859-7 compatibility).
No character that was encoded solely for compatibility with existing character sets (and it looks like U+0385 is one of those) ever serves as a precedent for encoding other similar characters for which the compatibility issue does not apply. -- Doug Ewell, CC, ALB | Lakewood, CO, US | ewellic.org
