Becker, Joseph wrote: > terminology in an informal statement, I wouldn't have a problem with the > simple update: > > 1) Unicode code units are not 8 bits long; deal with it. how about: 1) Unicode code units are not necessarily 8 bits long [wide], code points use 21 bits; deal with it. rationale: utf-8 uses 8-bit code units. sometimes, data structures need to be designed for code points rather than code units, and that width is more important then. markus
- Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Markus Scherer
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: Unicode FAQ addendum Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Doug Ewell
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum addison
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Markus Scherer
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Mark Davis
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- RE: Unicode FAQ addendum Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum jgo
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum jgo
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Doug Ewell
- RE: Unicode FAQ addendum Hohberger, Clive
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Paul Kein�nen

