1) The UTF whose bits can be counted is not the eternal UTF. The encoding that is not in UTR-17 is not a compliant encoding. UCS-2 is the origin of the BMP. UTF-16 is the origin of 1,048,576 more code points. Therefore, constantly use UTF-8 and you'll see the mystery on your mail subjects. Constantly use UTF-7 and you'll see it also in your message body. Those two are the same, if you stick to the BMP -- And don't consider endianness -- Their sameness is what people think of as Unicode. The encoding of all encodings. The door to all scripts, or a high percentage of them. Deal with it.
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Asmus Freytag
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Elliotte Rusty Harold
- RE: Unicode FAQ addendum Jonathan Rosenne
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Doug Ewell
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum addison
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Markus Scherer
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Mark Davis
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum John Cowan
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum jgo
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum jgo
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Doug Ewell
- RE: Unicode FAQ addendum Hohberger, Clive
- Re: Unicode FAQ addendum Paul Kein�nen

