>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:06 AM >What is important here is that, where ISO doesn't provide a code, that >users do have some other source of codes for internal and, more >importantly, interchange purposes. Many independent agencies and >individuals are already using Ethnologue codes in this way precisely >because ISO provides very limited coverage. I agree. For example when it was brought up that other Turkic languages might be using the dot less i. I noticed that the SIL confirmed that Azerbaijan uses the Latin alphabet. On the other hand it said that Urum was "Spoken by ethnic 'Greeks'". Unless this is some kind of inside joke I can not imagine any Greek having anything to do with anything Turkish. I was proposing using the SIL codes to supplement the ISO codes rather than the IANA codes. Carl
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Antoine Leca
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- RE: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- RE: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Peter_Constable
- RE: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Carl W. Brown
- RE: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Nick Nicholas
- RE: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Carl W. Brown
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Antoine Leca
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Otto Stolz
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Marion Gunn
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Doug Ewell
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Kevin Bracey
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Marion Gunn
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Edward Cherlin
- Re: [OT] Re: the Ethnologue Jonathan Coxhead