Ar 13:55 -0800 2000-10-03, scr�obh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >- The use of ISO 15924 for "sub-language specifications" has been removed >from the draft for the successor to RFC-1766 because there was no consensus >that the meaning and usage of these was clear. I don't thank this means they are forbidden in tags, though. It just means we weren't sure they were universally applicable enough to be specified in the RFC. Michael Everson ** Everson Gunn Teoranta ** http://www.egt.ie 15 Port Chaeimhghein �ochtarach; Baile �tha Cliath 2; �ire/Ireland Vox +353 1 478 2597 ** Fax +353 1 478 2597 ** Mob +353 86 807 9169 27 P�irc an Fh�ithlinn; Baile an Bh�thair; Co. �tha Cliath; �ire
- Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Steven R. Loomis
- Re: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Yung-Fong Tang
- Re: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Doug Ewell
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Ayers, Mike
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Peter_Constable
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Jukka . Korpela
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Michael Everson
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Marco . Cimarosti
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan
- Re: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional John Cowan
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Michael Everson
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Carl W. Brown
- RE: Locale ID's again: simplified vs. traditional Thomas Chan

