Rick McGowan wrote: > I'm quite, quite certain that claim is especially true for their Klingon > support, since Unicode is so antique-20th-century and so very linguistically > lame that it doesn't even support Klingon, despite the fact that (as the > article claims) Klingon is one of the "12 languages that cover over 75% of > the world's population". I mean, how could those Unicode people overlook > support for Klingon? Sheesh... In fact, of course, every extant Klingon text can be written with Unicode, and indeed with ISO 646:1983. -- There is / one art || John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
- "Giga Character Set": Anything besides... David Starner
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Carl W. Brown
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... John H. Jenkins
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Rick McGowan
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... John Cowan
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Curtis Clark
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Michael Everson
- RE: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Marco . Cimarosti
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Doug Ewell
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Frank da Cruz
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Michael Everson
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: "Giga Character Set": Anythin... John Jenkins

