On 02/26/2001 03:21:15 AM Marco Cimarosti wrote: >But would you say, following your definition, that the subset of the CJK >Script used to write Mandarin in Mainland China should be called "The >Chinese Simplified *Alphabet*"? It is a writing system, but not an alphabetic one. >- "Alphabet" is a specific class of scripts, whose principal characteristic >is that tends to map each sign to one of the language's phonemes. I would have used the term "alphabetic" to describe such scripts, and "alphabet" to refer to alphabetic writing systems. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Ayers, Mike
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Kenneth Whistler
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Joel Rees
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Michael Everson
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Michael Everson
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate... Kenneth Whistler

