On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:02:43PM -0800, Tex Texin wrote: > Perhaps the real question is what is the criteria for including or > excluding a fictional script. I have deleted John's mail, but > his criteria applied more broadly than Klingon if I recall. > > Should we worry about elvish communication and not Klingon? > Do we apply a business case to fictional scripts and not > to other scripts? One observation is that there is a need for some people to communicate in Klingon, and if we do not include it in UCS then they will probably invent their own character set. Keld
- Klingon silliness John O'Conner
- Re: Klingon silliness Rick McGowan
- Re: Klingon silliness Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Klingon silliness Tex Texin
- Re: Klingon silliness John O'Conner
- Re: Klingon silliness Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: Klingon silliness G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Klingon silliness David Starner
- Re: Klingon silliness G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Klingon silliness John Wilcock
- Re: Klingon silliness DougEwell2
- Re: Klingon silliness James Kass
- Re: Klingon silliness G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Klingon silliness G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Klingon silliness Michael Everson
- Re: Klingon silliness Rick McGowan

