At 9:59 AM -0800 3/9/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote: >Well, I guess that Chu-Nôm and Deseret are hardly known out of this mailing >list. > Au contraire, Deseret is quite well-known in LDS circles. Most Mormons who grew up in the Church have at least heard of it. It isn't extensively used, by any means, but there really are people out there who do want to use it on their computers. -- ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Yves Arrouye
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Allan Chau
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Ienup Sung
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Antoine Leca
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Ienup Sung
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Thomas Chan
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Yves Arrouye
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John H. Jenkins
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John H. Jenkins
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Michael Everson
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Thomas Chan
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John Jenkins
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Christopher John Fynn
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John Jenkins
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John Jenkins

