At 1:17 AM -0800 3/9/01, Marco Cimarosti wrote: >I am wondering especially about the CJK characters in Extension B. We all >know that the majority of them are rare, ancient or idiosyncratic >characters, but I am not quite sure that this is true for *all* of them. > Some of the characters in Extension B are required for JIS X 0213 support, which is going to be a sine qua non in Japan within a few years. There was a push a little while ago to put these characters on the BMP for precisely this reason, but it was opposed both within the UTC and WG2 and then abandoned. -- ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Keld J�rn Simonsen
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Allan Chau
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Peter_Constable
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Ienup Sung
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Ayers, Mike
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Antoine Leca
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Ienup Sung
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Thomas Chan
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Yves Arrouye
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John H. Jenkins
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John H. Jenkins
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Lars Marius Garshol
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Michael Everson
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Thomas Chan
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John Jenkins
- RE: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Christopher John Fynn
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John Jenkins
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code John Jenkins
- Re: UTF8 vs. Unicode (UTF16) in code Michael Everson

