"Suzanne M. Topping" wrote:
> In hunting around for negative opinions about Unicode, ...
Let me add one complaint to your list:
Thai is not stored/used in logical order in Unicode.
I know that many here have fought hard to get every script encoded and used in logical
order so that processing is fast. They lost.
This comes up in our (ICU) project right now because we are reimplementing our
collation code, and we have to hardcode Thai reordering there to in effect transform
the text on the fly to logical order.
In general, I would probably list every deviation from the principles: precomposed
characters including Hangul, compatibility characters, etc. They all need some special
code, like normalization, that would otherwise not be necessary.
markus
- RE: Unicode complaints Suzanne M. Topping
- RE: Unicode complaints Michael Everson
- Re: Unicode complaints John Jenkins
- RE: Unicode complaints Suzanne M. Topping
- RE: Unicode complaints Ayers, Mike
- Re: Unicode complaints John Jenkins
- Re: Unicode complaints Richard Cook
- Re: Unicode complaints John Cowan
- RE: Unicode complaints Suzanne M. Topping
- Re: Unicode complaints Tex Texin
- RE: Unicode complaints Markus Scherer
- RE: Unicode complaints Jonathan Rosenne
- RE: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Unicode complaints Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Unicode complaints Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Unicode complaints Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Unicode complaints Peter_Constable
- RE: Unicode complaints Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: Unicode complaints Peter_Constable
- Re: Unicode complaints Markus Scherer

