> Indeed. The inability to do simple, obvious things in these programs is > puzzling. Is the gain of glitzy, distracting features worth the loss of real > usability? The inability to see the true culprit is much more puzzling. Do you really mean to charge a program because it cannot handle something quite meaningless while there are so powerful other means? There where enough good arguments why [unicode] in the subject line is superfluous, but I learned this does not count at all. Fortunately, I don't depend on the subject line for filtering. I use the rules manager of Outlook and this works fine for me. Ciao, Mike
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Ayers, Mike
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Sean O Seaghdha
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Roozbeh Pournader
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Sean O Seaghdha
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Mark Leisher
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Daniel Biddle
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Mark Leisher
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Marco Cimarosti
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Marco Cimarosti
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Mark Leisher
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Mike Lischke
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Jeff Guevin
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Erland Sommarskog
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Michael Everson
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Jungshik Shin
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Jungshik Shin
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Yaap Pranger
- [unicode] Re: Moving mail lists Mark Leisher

