Ah, well the point in this case is that going forward, Microsoft has made a specific decision to make sure that new languages do not use the "backwards compatibility" mechanism of default system code pages. This does indicate that Unicode is no longer just a feature in an application, it is pretty much a requirement unless you are the sort of company that does not want to accept money from people in other locales who would otherwise be inclined to scribble out a check. I wish they had done it five years ago, myself. But they really did not have the architecture in place, or the tools really. MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Thomas Chan
- RE: Benefits of Unicode Alistair Vining
- RE: Benefits of Unicode Michael Everson
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Antoine Leca
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Richard Cook
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Tex Texin
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Tex Texin
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Tex Texin
- Re: Benefits of Unicode Edward Cherlin
- benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode David Starner
- Re: benefits of unicode Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode DougEwell2
- RE: benefits of unicode Marco Cimarosti
- RE: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Tex Texin
- Re: benefits of unicode Peter_Constable
- Re: benefits of unicode Edward Cherlin

