From: "Marco Cimarosti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Well, I am not saying that it would be easy, or that it would be worth > doing, but would it really take *millions* of dollars for implementing > Unicode on DOS or Windows 3.1? With Windows CE supporting Unicode, I think it would be cheaper to get *it* on such machines than it would be to support Win 3.1.... Not many people would be happy to go back to programming on it. Just say the word "segment" and watch us cringe. :-) MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... James Kass
- Re: (OT) Pyramid Blocks (was Latin w/ diacr... James Kass
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael Everson
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... James Kass
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Edward Cherlin
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... James Kass
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael Everson
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Carl W. Brown
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... James Kass
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable

