From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Win95 could perhaps be looked at as a revision of Win3.x that provides > partial support for Unicode. I shudder at this characterization, truly. :-) MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. http://www.trigeminal.com/
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Edward Cherlin
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... James Kass
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael Everson
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Carl W. Brown
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... James Kass
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits o... John Hudson
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Michael Everson
- Re: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Peter_Constable
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Latin w/ diacritics (was Re: benefits of uni... Kenneth Whistler

