On Wednesday, May 23, 2001, at 01:07 AM, Graham Asher wrote: > But I guess this is obvious. I just wanted to chime in with the view > that a > single Unicode Font would be useful, and a whole lot better than some > people suggest. > > Bear in mind that it is now impossible to produce a single TrueType font cover all of Unicode. In any event, what do people perceive as being the advantage of having a single font that covers the whole standard as opposed to a small suite of fonts that cover it? (I'm also speaking from a prejudiced position, because Apple's font fallback mechanism makes it unnecessary to explicitly set the font for a particular character in order to see it.) ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
- RE: Single Unicode Font Ayers, Mike
- RE: Single Unicode Font Carl W. Brown
- RE: Single Unicode Font Ayers, Mike
- RE: Single Unicode Font David Starner
- Re: Single Unicode Font John Jenkins
- RE: Single Unicode Font Chris Wendt
- RE: Single Unicode Font てんどうりゅうじ
- RE: Single Unicode Font Graham Asher
- Re: Single Unicode Font Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: Single Unicode Font Marco Cimarosti
- RE: Single Unicode Font John Jenkins
- RE: Single Unicode Font Carl W. Brown
- Re: Single Unicode Font Tom Gewecke
- Re: Single Unicode Font John Jenkins
- Re: Single Unicode Font G. Adam Stanislav
- RE: Single Unicode Font Ayers, Mike
- RE: Single Unicode Font てんどうりゅうじ
- RE: Single Unicode Font てんどうりゅうじ
- RE: Single Unicode Font Ayers, Mike
- RE: Single Unicode Font G. Adam Stanislav
- Re: Single Unicode Font Michael (michka) Kaplan

