On Wednesday, May 23, 2001, at 01:07 AM, Graham Asher wrote:

> But I guess this is obvious. I just wanted to chime in with the view 
> that a
> single Unicode Font would be useful, and a whole lot better than some
> people suggest.
>
>

Bear in mind that it is now impossible to produce a single TrueType font 
cover all of Unicode.

In any event, what do people perceive as being the advantage of having a 
single font that covers the whole standard as opposed to a small suite 
of fonts that cover it?

(I'm also speaking from a prejudiced position, because Apple's font 
fallback mechanism makes it unnecessary to explicitly set the font for a 
particular character in order to see it.)

=====
John H. Jenkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/

Reply via email to