At 14:52 -0700 2001-06-22, Yves Arrouye wrote: >Isn't UTF-17 just a sarcastic comment on all of this UTF-xxxx discussion? I think UTF-11digit would be clearly sarcastic. UTF-17, well, I don't know. I've been deleting the threads. Not my area. Didj'all like the Osmanya document? Y'all happy about Shavian being encoded? Have you seen the really cool new "Not the Roadmap" page? (See http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/ucs-roadmap.html) -- Michael Everson
- UTF-17 Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-17 Markus Scherer
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-17 Kenneth Whistler
- Re: UTF-17 Antoine Leca
- RE: UTF-17 Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF-17 Yves Arrouye
- RE: UTF-17 Kenneth Whistler
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- Re: Osmanya (from re: UTF-17) Michael Everson
- Re: Osmanya (from re: UTF-17) James Kass
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-17 Murray Sargent
- RE: UTF-17 Edward Cherlin
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-17 DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-17 Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-17 Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: UTF-17 John Cowan
- RE: UTF-17 Timothy Partridge

