In a message dated 2001-06-22 19:01:26 Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hey guys, Ken is just kidding. He's evidently tired of the current > plethora of ways to represent Unicode let alone all those new ones being > proposed. Sigh, I am too. Carl, you understand the problem of adding yet > another UTF: you too will probably have to support it. Oh yeah, well, I can be more tongue-in-cheek than all of you. I've already implemented it. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
- RE: UTF-17 Marco Cimarosti
- RE: UTF-17 Yves Arrouye
- RE: UTF-17 Kenneth Whistler
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-17 Michael Everson
- Re: Osmanya (from re: UTF-17) James Kass
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- RE: UTF-17 Murray Sargent
- RE: UTF-17 Edward Cherlin
- RE: UTF-17 Carl W. Brown
- Re: UTF-17 DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-17 Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- RE: UTF-17 Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: UTF-17 John Cowan
- RE: UTF-17 Timothy Partridge
- Re: UTF-17 DougEwell2
- Re: UTF-17 Lars Marius Garshol
- Re: UTF-17 Michael Everson
- RE: UTF-17 Yves Arrouye

