27 Jun 2001 13:38:33 +0100, Gaute B Strokkenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
> I would be indebted if any of the experts who hang out on the
> unicode list could sort out this confusion.
I would be glad if the resolution allowed UTF-8 and UTF-32 encoders and
decoders to not worry about surrogates at all. Please leave surrogate
issues to UTF-16.
It's a pity that UTF-16 doesn't encode characters up to U+FFFFF, such
that code points corresponding to lone surrogates can be encoded as
pairs of surrogates.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk * [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qrczak.ids.net.pl/
\__/
^^ SYGNATURA ZASTĘPCZA
QRCZAK
