Re: validity of lone surrogates

[Michael Everson]

At 08:04 +0000 2001-07-03, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
>27 Jun 2001 13:38:33 +0100, Gaute B Strokkenes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze:
>
>>  I would be indebted if any of the experts who hang out on the
>>  unicode list could sort out this confusion.
>
>I would be glad if the resolution allowed UTF-8 and UTF-32 encoders and
>decoders to not worry about surrogates at all. Please leave surrogate
>issues to UTF-16.

But what if I want to put up a Web page in Etruscan?
-- 
Michael Everson