I think the absence of the 64 hexagrams is a mistake, and the idea of composing them out of the trigrams (or of composing the trigrams out of pieces either) is extremely silly. Sorry, Rick, but there are things one can decompose and things one cannot. These are semantic entities, regardless of the glyphic representation. -- Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query John H. Jenkins
- Re: New characters query Jon Babcock
- Re: 64 Hexagrams, was re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Rick McGowan
- Hexagrams (was Re: New characters query) Edward Cherlin
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query John Cowan
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook

