At 23:18 -0700 2001-07-02, Rick McGowan wrote: >I don't think there's any point in encoding 64 hexagrams; especially when >we have the pieces already. Use the pieces of three and position them with >a drawing program. That isn't plain text. >We don't have combining thingies for putting chess >pieces on board squares, either. Yes, and, accordingly, our standard doesn't offer adequate support for chess as it has been traditionally typeset either. -- Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query Edward Cherlin
- Re: New characters query てんどうりゅうじ
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query John H. Jenkins
- Re: New characters query Jon Babcock
- Re: 64 Hexagrams, was re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Rick McGowan
- Hexagrams (was Re: New characters query) Edward Cherlin
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook
- Re: New characters query Michael Everson
- Re: New characters query John Cowan
- Re: New characters query Richard Cook

