Re: Re: Erratum in Unicode book

[James Kass]

Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:

> Actually, you are mistaken; U+9152 does indeed represent
> the character you wanted...

Perhaps he (てんどうりゅうじ) was lamenting the character's absence
in the Han Radical Index section under radical # 85.

If all the characters made from the water radical were listed
under that radical in the Han Radical Index (and so forth),
where would the sport be in looking up CJK code points?

The Han Radical Index is particulary useful when the significant
radical is known, kind of like having to know the correct
spelling of an English word before it can be looked up in an
English dictionary.

Best regards,

James Kass.