From: "Gaspar Sinai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > If the standard wants me to confuse the user, I would > rather dump the standard than comply.
Well, don't let the door hit you in the a** on the way out? Te users will be less confused than you realize -- only people who walk in with agendas see the flaws you claim. > Talking about characters: I think bi-di should not be in > Unicode Standard because it is not a character. > It is an algorithm. And it is documented as such. Clearly what you want of Unicode does not match what it actually is -- when my wife and I realized such about each other, she became my ex-wife. Since that is your goal here, I guess your "divorce" from Unicode should not be a surprise? <snip out of order> > Thank you for mentioning Yudit - I don't need > advertisement, there are enough users. Perhaps some will leave if you are honest about your "divorce" though -- you might be surprised how many people follow the standard? > I also start think this thread is a waste of time. > This thread won't solve the our problem. The only issue though is that we do not have a problem, here? > I feel sorry for interrupting in the "Let's praise and > celebrate Unicode" mood of this mailing list. Sorry, thats not the mood of the list. But in order to have a healthy respect for the people who give sound and reasonable arguments, we must show a matching lack of respect for those who give specious arguments. > I updated: > http://www.yudit.org/security/ > I wanted to remove it after solving the problem, but > it seems that this page will stay. The problem is solved, though. The real problem at this point can be found at http://www.yudit.org/gaspar/ though. MichKa Michael Kaplan Trigeminal Software, Inc. -- http://www.trigeminal.com/
