Thanks to everyone for researching this question! Deborah
On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Qingjiang (Brian) Yuan wrote: > Frank and Deborah, > After I saw the e-mail from Deborah, I asked our Beijing office to > contact the CESI. The follow is the information we got: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Have contacted with CESI. It is really a glyph bug. They have fixed it, > but they did not notify us! > > CESI will not give us the updated fonts until tomorrow morning. It was > said that there are serial glyph have been updated in the new version of > the bitmap fonts. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks. > Brian. > > Yung-Fong Tang Wrote: >> >> I looks like both Mac/Linux/Window N6.2 and current Mozilla map that to >> FFE3. Looks like IE on winXP do the same way. >> >> We, mozilla i18n group, got the GB18030 mapping table from sun. B Yuan, >> any comment? >> >> Michael Everson wrote: >> >>> At 11:23 -0800 2002-02-01, Deborah Goldsmith wrote: >>> >>>> There is an error on page 10 of the GB 18030-2000 standard, in that >>>> the character with code point A3FE maps to U+FFE3 (FULLWIDTH MACRON), >>>> but is shown with a glyph that corresponds to U+FF5E (FULLWIDTH >>>> TILDE). The position of the character in its code block would also >>>> seem to indicate that tilde was intended. >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any idea of which should be considered correct, the >>>> glyph or the Unicode mapping value? >>> >>> >>> Glyphs are informative in JTC1. I can only assume that the GB >>> standards would follow suit. >
