the following code point in GB18030 are map to Private Usaer Araea in Unicode but have a glyph in the GB18030 standard. What does that mean ?
page 11 of GB18030
0xA6EC
0xA6ED
0xA6F3
0xA6D9 - 0xA6DF
page 81 of GB18030
0xFE50 - 0xFEA0
ref- http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125407
Qingjiang (Brian) Yuan wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Frank and Deborah,
After I saw the e-mail from Deborah, I asked our Beijing office to
contact the CESI. The follow is the information we got:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have contacted with CESI. It is really a glyph bug. They have fixed it,
but they did not notify us!
CESI will not give us the updated fonts until tomorrow morning. It was
said that there are serial glyph have been updated in the new version of
the bitmap fonts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks.
Brian.
Yung-Fong Tang Wrote:I looks like both Mac/Linux/Window N6.2 and current Mozilla map that to
FFE3. Looks like IE on winXP do the same way.
We, mozilla i18n group, got the GB18030 mapping table from sun. B Yuan,
any comment?
Michael Everson wrote:At 11:23 -0800 2002-02-01, Deborah Goldsmith wrote:There is an error on page 10 of the GB 18030-2000 standard, in that
the character with code point A3FE maps to U+FFE3 (FULLWIDTH MACRON),
but is shown with a glyph that corresponds to U+FF5E (FULLWIDTH
TILDE). The position of the character in its code block would also
seem to indicate that tilde was intended.
Does anyone have any idea of which should be considered correct, the
glyph or the Unicode mapping value?
Glyphs are informative in JTC1. I can only assume that the GB
standards would follow suit.
