>Should there not be a "UniGlyph" encoding, for use by font designers, etc., > which would encode these glyph variants? People who type text do so in >Unicode, then the font internally converts it to UniGlyph in preparation >for display.
Sounds like a nice idea, but it's not quite that simple. It was also tried once, and that effort died. - Peter --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Peter Constable Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA Tel: +1 972 708 7485 E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
