At 13:38 +0330 2002-07-03, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: >On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, John Hudson wrote: > >> Too much of a pain. Last year I migrated all my Arabic and Hebrew glyph >> names to uniXXXX format; since Arabic characters not listed in the Adobe >> Glyph List need uniXXXX names anyway, it simply made more sense to use this >> format consistently for all glyphs. > >But won't non-standard glyph names get the user into trouble with some >existing pieces of software?
I don't use illegible names like uniXXXX. I have a whole huge list of user-friendly names that I use. -- Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
