On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Thomas Phinney wrote: > >I know of that, but I believe that when a glyph is in Adobe Glyph List, > >one MUST use that name, and a uniXXXX one. That's how I read the 'Unicode > >and Glyph Names' document. (Would someone inside Adobe explain?) > > Your use of the word "and" confuses me.
Oops, I meant "and not a uniXXXX one". Sorry. (I need to sleep longer, I know.) > For glyph names in the AGL, you can use either the AGL name, or the > uniXXXX name. This is something I am not sure about. As I read the document, you must use the AGL name. > In a very few cases, a glyph in the AGL is listed as potentially being > double-mapped, and one could use the AGL name as well as one of the two > uniXXXX names, if one wanted two separate glyphs. Or one could use two > uniXXXX names. Yes, I know that. > There are some older versions of Adobe apps that would only recognize > the AGL name, but anything from the last several years should be able to > use either. This is very useful information. Any pointers to more? roozbeh
