At 08:29 3/7/2002, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> > For glyph names in the AGL, you can use either the AGL name, or the
> > uniXXXX name.
>
>This is something I am not sure about. As I read the document, you must
>use the AGL name.
Section 2.c.i of the document does suggest that the AGL name should be used
if present, but I suspect that this is something that Adobe might want to
revise when they add the information about supplementary plane characters.
The technology that relies on the glyph naming conventions -- with the
exception of older software that does not handle Unicode -- does not
require AGL names to be used in preference to uniXXXX names. Indeed, there
was a brief period when Adobe's euro character support was only partially
implemented in which using /uni20AC/ produced better results that /Euro/.
When Paul Nelson and I were discussing glyph naming for the Arabic
Typesetting font, I recall consulting Adobe about using uniXXXX names in
place of the AFII Arabic names in the AGL. I can't find the messages, but
the eventual decision was to use the uniXXXX names.
John Hudson
Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com
Vancouver, BC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... es ist ein unwiederbringliches Bild der Vergangenheit,
das mit jeder Gegenwart zu verschwinden droht, die sich
nicht in ihm gemeint erkannte.
... every image of the past that is not recognized by the
present as one of its own concerns threatens to disappear
irretrievably.
Walter Benjamin
