On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Michael Everson wrote: > Double-plus ungood.
doubleplus ungood, IIRC. roozbeh
- Should there be a "UniGlyph" sta... ろ〇〇〇〇 ろ〇〇〇
- Re: Should there be a "UniGlyph&... John Hudson
- Re: Should there be a "UniGlyph&... Asmus Freytag
- [OT] Slight Font Confusion Charlie Jolly
- Re: [OT] Slight Font Confusio... John H. Jenkins
- Re: [OT] Slight Font Conf... John Wilcock
- Re: [OT] Slight Font... John H. Jenkins
- Re: [OT] Slight Font Conf... Michael Everson
- Re: [OT] Slight Font... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: [OT] Slight Font Conf... Yaap Raaf
- Re: [OT] Slight Font Confusio... John Hudson
- Re: Should there be a "UniGl... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Should there be a "U... John Hudson
- Re: Should there be a &qu... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Should there be ... John Hudson
- Re: Should there... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Should there be ... Michael Everson
- Re: Should there... John Hudson
- Re: Should there be a "UniGlyph&... Kenneth Whistler
