BTW, for those of you who don't know me, this was not a statement of my own outlook, it's a summary of the outlook of a big group of objectors.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Suzanne M. Topping > Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 1:42 PM > To: Unicode Mailing List > Subject: RE: Talk about Unicode Myths... > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Curtis Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Maybe I'm missing something here. My browsers don't display > ASCII in > > fraktur, because I have not selected a fraktur font as either > > the system > > font or the default browser font. It seems to me that an > > average Japanese > > user would have only Japanese fonts installed, so that all > > CJK would appear > > in Japanese style no matter what its source. Why is there an issue? > > It's an issue because many people hate Han unification, and > don't think > fonts should be the answer. Separate encodings for glyph variations > should be the answer. Anything else is a cultural slap in the face. > > (Simplified answer of course.) > >
