At 13:50 +0100 2002-06-01, William Overington wrote:

>  > Nice one, Doug.  Unfortunately, on my system, that collides with the
>ConScript version of Shavian which I have installed, so I got something
>unexpected.  ��
>
>Yet ConScript has now withdrawn that allocation and now uses that code point
>for Ewellic.
>
>http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/ewellic.html
>
>What is interesting is as to how Doug produced that effect.  How was it done
>please?

Doug applied for Ewellic and John and I, who verily are the Lords of 
the ConScript Registry, assigned it an allocation.

Please note that ConScript is for fun. It is for play. It is not to 
be taken seriously. It is an experiment to see whether people 
interested in some of those scripts will agree to use PUA to exchange 
data. Interestingly, some folks have for Shavian. No one seems to for 
Tengwar.

Of course Shavian implementations should be upgrading to Unicode 
encoding now. :-)
-- 
Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com

Reply via email to