James Kass wrote: > Is this a graphic showing the experimental diacritics you mention? > http://www.geocities.com/avarangal/imagay1.gif > > If so, it should be possible for most of these to be encoded in text > as pronunciation indicators using existing Unicode characters. > > Glyph - Unicode > No. Poss. > -------------------- > [...] > 0096 U+E6FD ** > [...] > > ** The stroke in Phaistos symbols in ConScript PUA encoding is > the closest I could find.
:-))) C'mon, be serious! That can be mapped to U+0316 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT BELOW). _ Marco
