On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, James Kass wrote: > A further note about the proposed "character", a user who is > expecting to see this presentation form would probably be > quite dismayed to find a missing glyph in its place. That may > well be a frequent occurence, especially at first.
And it's also a reason for why a compatiblity decomposition is needed for it. When some piece of modern software doesn't find it in an older font, it can display it as its decomposition. roozbeh
