James Kass wrote as follows. > Indeed, a program designed to display actual superscripts based on the notational form would work pretty much the same regardless of whether standard or non-standard characters are used, and the editing or input screen would also look essentially identical.
Yes, yet using Private Use Area codes would not clash the meanings of the regular Unicode characters, so maybe that is preferable. > "Standard only amongst those end users who choose" seems to be a way of saying "non-standard". Almost but not quite. It is like describing someone's request for something as "not unreasonable" rather than as "reasonable". A distinction of the use of the English language where Boolean alternatives are not quite the case. Thank you for your help. William Overington 14 August 2002
