At 20:59 +0000 2002-10-28, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote: >On 2002.10.28, 13:09, David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Basically, any decorative or handwriting font can't be a Unicode font. ><...> >> Seems pointless to tell a lot of the fontmakers out there that they >> shouldn't worry about Unicode, because Unicode's only for standard >> book fonts > >Hm, what if I want to make, say, snow capped Devanagari glyphs for my >hiking company in Nepal? Shouldn't I assign them to Unicode code points?
That's what Private Use code positions are for. -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com ------ I don't think so. He seems to be talking about a specific typographic style. Code points don't care about style, whether it's Franklin Gothic or Snowcapped Helvetica. Don
