At 20:59 +0000 2002-10-28, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:
On 2002.10.28, 13:09, David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Basically, any decorative or handwriting font can't be a Unicode font.
<...>
Seems pointless to tell a lot of the fontmakers out there that they
shouldn't worry about Unicode, because Unicode's only for standard
book fonts
Hm, what if I want to make, say, snow capped Devanagari glyphs for my
hiking company in Nepal? Shouldn't I assign them to Unicode code points?
That's what Private Use code positions are for.
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
