Doug Ewell wrote: > Actually, the Sütterlin umlaut-mark is a small italicized > "e," which is very similar to an "n." What it really > ends up looking like, from a distance, is a double acute.
Ah! I never realized that the Sütterlin zig-zag-shaped "e" was the missing with the "¨" glyph! Thanks! After all, this discussion has not been completely useless. :-) _ Marco
