Peter Constable wrote as follows. >You'll probably come back to say, "But I was talking about 'ordinary >TrueType fonts'."
No I won't. It's not my personality type to do so. Have a look at the Myers Briggs Type Indicator for personality type, the key message is that not everybody has the same personality type. I may argue a point if I consider it right to do so, but I do not argue something just for the sake of arguing or because of some notion of not being willing to lose face or something like that in accepting that I did not previously know something. I mean, that is pointless and is a waste of time. Anyway, it is not my nature to be like that. So, I did not know the correct situation and you have helped me by explaining more about it. Thank you. >If you insist on an invalid assumption, there's no way >to argue against it. It's like saying, "software with a character-mode UI >is not capable of displaying bitmap graphics" -- true, but irrelevant. But I won't, it's not my personality to so so. I genuinely did not understand and I am grateful to you for explaining the matter to me. >If you really want a dialog box to popup providing notification to the >user, I'm wondering how many times as the file is opened and a page is >rendered you'd like this popup to appear? Once. A notification in a dialogue box that the problem exists with a button to click for further detailed information as to which character or characters, how many times for each, and on which pages and lines. >17 times if there are 17 >instances of < c, ZWJ, t > that are not rendered as a ct ligature? No, just the once. >Not on >my system, thank you. Certainly not! Thank you for explaining the matter about the TrueType fonts. William Overington 7 November 2002
