Re: Coptic II?

[Michael Everson]

At 16:43 +0000 09/11/2002, Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin wrote:

The roadmap v3.5 < http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/bmp-3-5.html >, as
of 2002.04.04, refers for block U+2C00 - U+2C3F a formal proposal for
"Coptic". Failing to access the linked proposal right now, what is the
difference between this script and the coptic chars included in the
Greek block (U+0370 - U+03FF)?

http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/bmp-3-9.html is the current version. The Coptic characters at the Greek block are only part of the Coptic script.

See http://www.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n2444.pdf
--
Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com