The difference between the Arabic Kaf (U+0643) and the Persian Kaf
(U+06A9) is in it's final form. The Arabic Kaf has a Hamza and is
missing the diagonal line above the glyoh.
Kind Regards,
Houman

-----Original Message-----
From: Magda Danish (Unicode) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 10:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Farsi Keheh +06A9 vs. Arabic Kaf +0643 ??

Hello, I received this email and was hoping that someone on the list
(Roozbeh, maybe) would shed some light on this issue. Please cc Laura
Tull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thank you,
Regards,

Magda Danish
Administrative Director
The Unicode Consortium
650-693-3921

******** BECOME A MEMBER OF THE UNICODE CONSORTIUM NOW ********
BE AMONG THE FIRST TO RECEIVE YOUR FREE COPY OF THE UNICODE STANDARD
V4.0 
AND WE'LL ADD YOUR NAME IN THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT SECTION OF THE NEW BOOK 
DETAILS SOON ON http://www.unicode.org/unicode/consortium/join.html
****************************************************************


> -----Original Message-----
> Date/Time:    Wed Dec 11 09:55:25 EST 2002
> Contact:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Report Type:  Other Question, Problem, or Feedback
> 
> I'm trying to find out some information about the extended 
> Arabic character KEHEH (06A9), which the code chart indicates 
> is used in the Persian (Farsi) language.  Staff familiar with 
> Persian in the library use the Arabic letter KAF (0643) 
> instead of this and the two characters look the same to them. 
>  What is the difference? If no difference, why two code points?
> 
> This was noticed as soon as we tried using the Farsi(Persian) 
> keyboard in Windows 2000.  It contains the KEHEH character 
> but does not have a KAF.  I have already made inquiries of 
> Microsoft about this and the character that looks like the 
> KAF to us definitely maps to 06A9.
> 
> Is there an expert in the Persian language who could help?
> 
> Laura Tull
> Systems Librarian
> Ohio State University 
> 
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> (End of Report)
> 
> 


Reply via email to