On 2002.12.24, 20:01, Asmus Freytag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This situation is exacerbated by the fact that Latin and Cyrillic Q > and W do not look noticably different, if at all, which means that the > even the (inadvertant) future use of Latin Q and W cannot be ruled > out, perpetuating the incidences of dual encoding.
Devil's advocate would point out that one can say the very same thing about A, B, C and many such pairs of cyrillic-latin equivalents (some of them false ones, granted). FWIW, I have experienced many cases (esp. in e-mail) of this, especially with swapped U+0441 and U+0063, which are placed on the same key in most cyrillic keyboards. -- ____. Ant�nio MARTINS-Tuv�lkin | ()| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |####| R. Laureano de Oliveira, 64 r/c esq. | PT-1885-050 MOSCAVIDE (LRS) N�o me invejo de quem tem | +351 917 511 549 carros, parelhas e montes | http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ s� me invejo de quem bebe | http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a �gua em todas as fontes |
