On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:29:29 -0800 (PST), "Doug Ewell" wrote: > Indeed, the TLG proposal for numerals [1] > does include a GREEK HALF SIGN, although their preferred glyph does not > include the "prime" sign Raymond mentioned (it is listed as a glyph > variant, however).
Yet Footnote 1 in this document does use a "prime" sign in all its examples of the usage of the 1/2 and 2/3 glyphs. Does this mean perhaps that the unadorned (prime-less) 1/2 and 2/3 characters need to be used in conjunction with a "prime" sign (U+????) to represent 1/2 and 2/3 ? Andrew
